I think on the whole it's pretty positive - I like his closing comments of course ;-) and I understand where he's coming from with the graphics - there are elements that are pretty awful (character design and animation for example). That comes from trying to do everything oneself. The lack of multiplayer and in-game saves are a definite lack.
It's interesting the range of opinions TU's received from the reviewers. There's been gushing puff-pieces that even I felt were OTT to one completely dismissive review by a self confessed strategy/rpg/board game afficionado who surprise, surprise, just didn't like the game and wrote it off on that basis (thanks mate).
Thing is, if you get one really bad/unfair review, it can drop your metacritc score. This then affects where your game appears on a number of Steam pages.
It's interesting the range of opinions TU's received from the reviewers. There's been gushing puff-pieces that even I felt were OTT to one completely dismissive review by a self confessed strategy/rpg/board game afficionado who surprise, surprise, just didn't like the game and wrote it off on that basis (thanks mate).
Thing is, if you get one really bad/unfair review, it can drop your metacritc score. This then affects where your game appears on a number of Steam pages.