uh...yeah, and it's more secure that way. Not to mention most professional businesses have HD copy devices. But lets have all the most important data on a network instead. Less labour and less secure.
Well, i would assme companies (and certain individuals - if cheap enough) would use their own Midori-Server(s) of some kind, so it would certainly be more secure for companies if that was the case. I was reading about a oil company that uses a Linux based centralized server/supercomputer with remote thin clients for their more sensitive stuff. The geometry for X forwarding is so seamless and of such a high standard its almost as good as the real thing even with transport encryption - and thats about as secure as it can get as no data is stored on the client at all, and all IT support is done in one place. Personally I would not trust a 3rd party host with MY data. I would want my OWN server/client(s) or a PC.
Think about it, if the majority of clueless PC users could email, wordprocess, use the web, listen to music etc.. through a remote desktop environment on a cheap "set-top box" thin client (something the "dreadded" linux is better at, from both server and client ends at the moment) there would be an monumental drop in windows sales. Of course many would still use/need PCs too, but not everyone would NEED one for basic tasks thus taking away this annoying need for everything to be fluffy, friendly, safe and downright patronising. (and good riddance to it too! It would return the PC to being a tool for computer oriented people rather than as a obligatory household appliance to serve the botnets. Better for the environment as well.)
This kind of thing has got MS terrified. They have been lagging in this area for a long time. People like Nomachine have been doing it for a while and offer a range of good (if expensive) Linux/xp RemotePC solutions. VMware is also way ahead technology wise. Check out the live demos on nomachine if you have a fast link and see what i mean.