ImaginaryHuman is very good at dancing around the fact that his arguments are hollow and lack both substance and logic. Very interesting.
It must now be very clear to anyone who has been following this thread how poorly both his arguments and opinions (and those of other "magical thinkers") stand up to analysis. They might be smothered in metaphorical and mystical obfuscation, but essentially they all boil down to a single premise: "If I like something, it must be true. If I don't, it can't be true."
It must now be very clear to anyone who has been following this thread how poorly both his arguments and opinions (and those of other "magical thinkers") stand up to analysis. They might be smothered in metaphorical and mystical obfuscation, but essentially they all boil down to a single premise: "If I like something, it must be true. If I don't, it can't be true."