Exactly. It's yet another step in trying to get real-life things and activities into computers, while the computer itself already has a good interface of its own. It's like a piano player who wants his grand piano to sound like a flute. I mean, about those photos: I've them in a dir, hundreds of 'em, and I browse through them with ACDSee upon which I see each photo full screen. Why would I want all those hundreds of photos randomly cluttered around in some area? Be glad that a computer forms an alternative for real photos (which indeed may at some point be scattered around the place), let's take advantage of the computer idiom instead of trying to change it to real-life idiom.
Touch screen means you only have max 10 'screenlocation-inputs'. A keyboard has 100-some keys to be used for everything. And if done smart, functionality that works together uses tactically layed-out hotkeys (e.g. all keys which you can reach with only your left hand while not moving it).
Gadget, no more. Comparable with speech input.
Touch screen means you only have max 10 'screenlocation-inputs'. A keyboard has 100-some keys to be used for everything. And if done smart, functionality that works together uses tactically layed-out hotkeys (e.g. all keys which you can reach with only your left hand while not moving it).
Gadget, no more. Comparable with speech input.