Its simpler to blame others for own incapabilities yeah, but that does not make the fact any better that Linux devs, while developing now stable stuff don't think further than their feets are long. Otherwise its hard to understand why they need that "instant fixes" and need multiple kernel patches per year.
The "all userspace" stuff is basically a good idea but both have their benefit and it yet needs to be shown that Linux is any better. It trades in one benefit for a corresponding bad thing bound to the architecture. There is and always will be shadow where there is light, no OS will be an exeption to that.
I use Windows and OSX. Gives me broad compatibility, a few nice apps on OSX and on top of that a WORKING Unix based X11 system. (something I've yet to see on Linux, especially the free-tuxies. At the current rate, SUSE and Mandriva will show the "click your OS" distributions how an OS is meant to work and to be handled)
The "all userspace" stuff is basically a good idea but both have their benefit and it yet needs to be shown that Linux is any better. It trades in one benefit for a corresponding bad thing bound to the architecture. There is and always will be shadow where there is light, no OS will be an exeption to that.
I use Windows and OSX. Gives me broad compatibility, a few nice apps on OSX and on top of that a WORKING Unix based X11 system. (something I've yet to see on Linux, especially the free-tuxies. At the current rate, SUSE and Mandriva will show the "click your OS" distributions how an OS is meant to work and to be handled)