I think if they guy clearly marks his images as copyrighted and it says so on the image and on his site then he certainly has the right to go after anyone to the full extent of the law.
He's not MAKING people violate his copyright or luring them into a copyright violation, just pursuing people that do.
I don't like what he's doing and I think it's very tough on those people hosting the content but if you take away his legitimate right to pursue those claims isn't that worse?
There should probably be more guidance about what kind of compensation should be made available for this kind of trivial violation.
Darkheart
He's not MAKING people violate his copyright or luring them into a copyright violation, just pursuing people that do.
I don't like what he's doing and I think it's very tough on those people hosting the content but if you take away his legitimate right to pursue those claims isn't that worse?
There should probably be more guidance about what kind of compensation should be made available for this kind of trivial violation.
Darkheart