im guessing 10/15 whatever years ago video capture wasnt what it is now
perhaps a camcorder and some bespoke hard/software resulting in sprites that are only 100 odd pixels high
so unless they filmed on 72fps film and then scanned each frame in at a very high res they always will be shitty looking but way better than (atari's?) pit fighter with its monochromatic jcvd and 2 other blokies and odds and sods bad guys
i say 72 and not 24 as for fluid movement a fast film is better eg watching bats at 1/3rd speed gives you a better idea of their movement
perhaps a camcorder and some bespoke hard/software resulting in sprites that are only 100 odd pixels high
so unless they filmed on 72fps film and then scanned each frame in at a very high res they always will be shitty looking but way better than (atari's?) pit fighter with its monochromatic jcvd and 2 other blokies and odds and sods bad guys
i say 72 and not 24 as for fluid movement a fast film is better eg watching bats at 1/3rd speed gives you a better idea of their movement