I think the LGPL should be scrapped entirely. Any half successful LGPL lib ends up with static linking exceptions effectively making it public domain in my book.
And you are sure you understand the ins and outs of LGPL right?
LGPL is the same as GPL just that it isn't totally worthless for libraries.
It ensures that your technology that you put under LGPL is opensource and must remain so (statically linking does not change that you can still get the exact source of it from the creators page) while still allowing real developers to use it in the officially distributed way. If they want to alter it, they have to make the code available just like under GPL.
There is nothing worse than pure GPL libraries.
Who the hell would use a library within his project that enforces the whole project to be open sourced unless that was the original plan?
GPL actively destroys a library / software component (for whole software packages its a whole different thing, there it actually makes sense to make sure that components get open sourced again)
Think about it yourself: If LGPL and similar licenses didn't exist, BM would not exist at all, as a simple example, as libjpg, libpng etc would enforce GPL and as quite a lot in BM relies on the image usage, all that code would need to be GPL as well.