or
c) None of the above.
If you have a type with 100 methods then you might want to consider whether that type can be split into seperate objects especially if the type has many attributes. This will make it more readable.
There's going to be no memory issues as only 1 copy of the method exists regardless of the number of instances.
I like BRL way of coding.
Standalone functions which take an object as a parm which then call the method. It seems to make more sense that way.
c) None of the above.
If you have a type with 100 methods then you might want to consider whether that type can be split into seperate objects especially if the type has many attributes. This will make it more readable.
There's going to be no memory issues as only 1 copy of the method exists regardless of the number of instances.
I like BRL way of coding.
Standalone functions which take an object as a parm which then call the method. It seems to make more sense that way.