>I've tried to explain to you what's going on in the demo
>but you're just not listening I guess.
You were not explaining what's going on, which was the reason for my prodding.
>In every one of your posts you're trying to discredit that
>I'm modeling real flight physics.
Not at all. You started out by posting about an open source flight sim, and the second you feel you have something that appears to work, you get very excited and shortly afterwards very secretive and aggressive when people ask questions.
I am very happy that someone is doing it. I'm simply trying to follow the development.
>Sorry but don't care if you believe me or not.
Good, you shouldn't care if other people believe you or not. But atleast entertain the possibility that people might ask questions out of curiosity.
Let's get back to the topic at hand. EDIT An F/A-18 intercepter remake would likely be very popular among Amigans. A few 'corrections' like the ability to destroy buildings and actual Mig models would propably be needed though...
Andy
>but you're just not listening I guess.
You were not explaining what's going on, which was the reason for my prodding.
>In every one of your posts you're trying to discredit that
>I'm modeling real flight physics.
Not at all. You started out by posting about an open source flight sim, and the second you feel you have something that appears to work, you get very excited and shortly afterwards very secretive and aggressive when people ask questions.
I am very happy that someone is doing it. I'm simply trying to follow the development.
>Sorry but don't care if you believe me or not.
Good, you shouldn't care if other people believe you or not. But atleast entertain the possibility that people might ask questions out of curiosity.
Let's get back to the topic at hand. EDIT An F/A-18 intercepter remake would likely be very popular among Amigans. A few 'corrections' like the ability to destroy buildings and actual Mig models would propably be needed though...
Andy