More statistics:
Google search hits (in K) for ISP name + "Great" or "Sucks"
Great/Sucks = Ratio of greatness to suckiness. Higher values indicate greatness. Values less than 1 indicate more suckiness than greatness.
Softcom: 52/2 = 26:1 (May be skewed by so few hits)
LiquidWeb: 113/11 = 10.3:1
Powweb: 240/39 = 6.2:1
MediaTemple: 600/103 = 5.8:1
GoDaddy: 1200/251 = 4.8:1
Dreamhost: 1000/350 = 2.9:1
Z-Host: Less than 1000 for each. Too few hits to consider.
DataFlame: Less than 1000 for each. Too few hits to consider.
Ugh, this is impossible... Even with PowWeb up that high in the list some of the things I've read about them paint them in a bad light. But the same could be said for any of the other web hosts above too. Except the ones that seem so small time that they don't have enough customers to post complaints....
Google search hits (in K) for ISP name + "Great" or "Sucks"
Great/Sucks = Ratio of greatness to suckiness. Higher values indicate greatness. Values less than 1 indicate more suckiness than greatness.
Softcom: 52/2 = 26:1 (May be skewed by so few hits)
LiquidWeb: 113/11 = 10.3:1
Powweb: 240/39 = 6.2:1
MediaTemple: 600/103 = 5.8:1
GoDaddy: 1200/251 = 4.8:1
Dreamhost: 1000/350 = 2.9:1
Z-Host: Less than 1000 for each. Too few hits to consider.
DataFlame: Less than 1000 for each. Too few hits to consider.
Ugh, this is impossible... Even with PowWeb up that high in the list some of the things I've read about them paint them in a bad light. But the same could be said for any of the other web hosts above too. Except the ones that seem so small time that they don't have enough customers to post complaints....