>But without marks comments I wouldnt have known that Mark
>did not support this, and nether would you.
So if Mark was OK with it, you wouldn't mind buying a product which is clearly illegal and contains parts of other products by other manufacturers but without their consent?
Good thing it's not about Marks support. There's this thing called IP law, which in most industrialized countries make it illegal to do what the guy did.
>And I for one would have used the demo rather than base my
>desicion on the quality of the English on the web page.
Why?. He admitted to it being B3D on the website! Case closed!
>True, but if macus didnt include the DLL in his download,
>then he could still try and sell the wrapper to Bmax users
>that already have b3d, so why not BRL jump on this
>bandwagon
Because BRL management decided not to. You're not a stockholder, so they don't have to defend their decisions to you.
Andy
>did not support this, and nether would you.
So if Mark was OK with it, you wouldn't mind buying a product which is clearly illegal and contains parts of other products by other manufacturers but without their consent?
Good thing it's not about Marks support. There's this thing called IP law, which in most industrialized countries make it illegal to do what the guy did.
>And I for one would have used the demo rather than base my
>desicion on the quality of the English on the web page.
Why?. He admitted to it being B3D on the website! Case closed!
>True, but if macus didnt include the DLL in his download,
>then he could still try and sell the wrapper to Bmax users
>that already have b3d, so why not BRL jump on this
>bandwagon
Because BRL management decided not to. You're not a stockholder, so they don't have to defend their decisions to you.
Andy