I don't think these results are very consistent... Just comparing my machine with that of Shambler:
I am alledgedly in the top 4%, he's at 26%. yet:
1) We both have 1GB of RAM
2) We both run Windows XP
3) He has 10 times as much free diskspace
4) His CPU is marginally faster
5) He has twice as much video memory
6) His video card is three times faster than mine:
Look at the 3DMark 2003 ratings for our respective video cards, found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/10/04/vga_charts_iv/page5.html#3dmark_2003
The GeForce 6800GT gets a rating of 10957 while my Radeon 9600 Pro gets a measly 3518.
This does not make a whole lot of sense.
I am alledgedly in the top 4%, he's at 26%. yet:
1) We both have 1GB of RAM
2) We both run Windows XP
3) He has 10 times as much free diskspace
4) His CPU is marginally faster
5) He has twice as much video memory
6) His video card is three times faster than mine:
Look at the 3DMark 2003 ratings for our respective video cards, found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/10/04/vga_charts_iv/page5.html#3dmark_2003
The GeForce 6800GT gets a rating of 10957 while my Radeon 9600 Pro gets a measly 3518.
This does not make a whole lot of sense.