Well, it's really not that bad, but it has those little accessibility errors that people generally won't notice, and if they do they usually won't care.
But when you do notice, it really sucks!
Although, this is truly an achievement:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.target.com
Okay, lots of web sites don't bother with w3 standards and thus confuse the validator, but... Eugh. Getting 556 errors is a skill, and a heck of a lot of those are simple things like tags requiring Alt attributes.
I suppose what I really originally meant to state before my ranting took over was that the whole situation is absurd.
Judges who let folks sue for stuff like this could really do with looking at things more critically and not being caught up in the horrendously thick law books which seem to be eating our souls.
But when you do notice, it really sucks!
Although, this is truly an achievement:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.target.com
Okay, lots of web sites don't bother with w3 standards and thus confuse the validator, but... Eugh. Getting 556 errors is a skill, and a heck of a lot of those are simple things like tags requiring Alt attributes.
I suppose what I really originally meant to state before my ranting took over was that the whole situation is absurd.
Judges who let folks sue for stuff like this could really do with looking at things more critically and not being caught up in the horrendously thick law books which seem to be eating our souls.