Problem is I'm not sure it it would be so much better in 3D because if their scaned images are all 800x600 this would mean 4MB VRAM per image (as it would be 1024x1024)
With 50 Images this simply means 200MB VRAM, which is much for a little scanner app.
You could do it with pixmaps, but only few commands of the Max2D command set work with pixmaps.
don't know if VB creates thumbnails before rendering them to picture box but if not, this is most likely what I would suggest to check.
This would be needed within BM as well, as otherwise it would need more than 200MB VRAM as mentioned above.
*it would in any way require 200-300 MB regular RAM to work ... otherwise the reason for crawling is because loading from page file is just deadly slow ...*
With 50 Images this simply means 200MB VRAM, which is much for a little scanner app.
You could do it with pixmaps, but only few commands of the Max2D command set work with pixmaps.
don't know if VB creates thumbnails before rendering them to picture box but if not, this is most likely what I would suggest to check.
This would be needed within BM as well, as otherwise it would need more than 200MB VRAM as mentioned above.
*it would in any way require 200-300 MB regular RAM to work ... otherwise the reason for crawling is because loading from page file is just deadly slow ...*