I was going to take general opinion(lazy me) but sence I got mixed response I decided to test it myself. this is the program I tested it width:
it trully is insignificant compared to the number of cycles it had to perform. on my Athlon xp 2900+
I got 16 millisec VS 50 millisec difference 60000 operations in half of second. I can live width that.
Thanks everybody.
Local array#[360] For x = 0 To 359 array[x] =Cos(x) Next sec = MilliSecs() For x = 0 To 60000 n = array[x Mod 360]/array[x Mod 360]*array[x Mod 360]/array[x Mod 360]+array[x Mod 360]/array[x Mod 360]/array[x Mod 360]/array[x Mod 360] Next lapse = MilliSecs() - sec Print lapse sec = MilliSecs() For x = 0 To 60000 n = Cos(x Mod 360)/Cos(x Mod 360)*Cos(x Mod 360)/Cos(x Mod 360)+Cos(x Mod 360)/Cos(x Mod 360)/Cos(x Mod 360)/Cos(x Mod 360) Next lapse = MilliSecs()-sec Print lapse
it trully is insignificant compared to the number of cycles it had to perform. on my Athlon xp 2900+
I got 16 millisec VS 50 millisec difference 60000 operations in half of second. I can live width that.
Thanks everybody.