thx guys... that explains it...
i dunno though... it seems contrary to the whole purpose of encapsulating the properties of a TYPE or CLASS though...
ahhhh, maybe i'm missing something here... i'll follow the discussion... maybe i'll get it eventually... don't wanna sidetrack the thread from the original topic...
thx again...
--Mike
i dunno though... it seems contrary to the whole purpose of encapsulating the properties of a TYPE or CLASS though...
ahhhh, maybe i'm missing something here... i'll follow the discussion... maybe i'll get it eventually... don't wanna sidetrack the thread from the original topic...
thx again...
--Mike