@Red Stop having a go at me for not knowing everything ;o
These laws must exist otherwise what is it that microsoft are appealing against? The are appealing against a "AntiTrust" decision by Brussles.
Now Im not suddjesting that we approch the court in Brussles and start a court case, because I DONT KNOW ANYTHING, about Antitrust laws. I was trying to see if there was anyone here who was a lawer, rather than go to a law site and try to find someone who knew about blitz and TGC
If the whole thing is impossible within a fedral/european court, is it possible in a British court. (Again I DONT KNOW)
The bottom line is that TGC have removed from the market two applications which are for use by their main(?) competitor. It may not breach any "AntiTrust" law, (whether they exist or not), but its not Cricket.
Puki has been asking nicly for them for ages, and I simply wanted to know if anyone here had the qualifications or experiance to say if what they were doing was infact unlawful (Without having to pay £250 an hour)
These laws must exist otherwise what is it that microsoft are appealing against? The are appealing against a "AntiTrust" decision by Brussles.
Now Im not suddjesting that we approch the court in Brussles and start a court case, because I DONT KNOW ANYTHING, about Antitrust laws. I was trying to see if there was anyone here who was a lawer, rather than go to a law site and try to find someone who knew about blitz and TGC
If the whole thing is impossible within a fedral/european court, is it possible in a British court. (Again I DONT KNOW)
The bottom line is that TGC have removed from the market two applications which are for use by their main(?) competitor. It may not breach any "AntiTrust" law, (whether they exist or not), but its not Cricket.
Puki has been asking nicly for them for ages, and I simply wanted to know if anyone here had the qualifications or experiance to say if what they were doing was infact unlawful (Without having to pay £250 an hour)