IMO, Mark now could not go back to Blitz3d because if he stops the development of Max3D,
he will be blamed by the existing blitzMax users. Existing Blitzmax users may go away.
He must continue to develop Max3D no matter what we say.
If he does not concentrate on Max3D, Max3D could not be released on schedule (December).
So, Max3D may be another great success or failure (as someone call this gambling)
If Max3D is a failure, Mark may go back to Blitz3D.
In short, there is no hope for new features for Blitz3D, even it is the GREAT, EASY language on earth.
BTW, Blitz3D is considered old because it does not support dx9 or above and only Mark know
how much work is needed to support dx9 (may be very easy for him).
:)
he will be blamed by the existing blitzMax users. Existing Blitzmax users may go away.
He must continue to develop Max3D no matter what we say.
If he does not concentrate on Max3D, Max3D could not be released on schedule (December).
So, Max3D may be another great success or failure (as someone call this gambling)
If Max3D is a failure, Mark may go back to Blitz3D.
In short, there is no hope for new features for Blitz3D, even it is the GREAT, EASY language on earth.
BTW, Blitz3D is considered old because it does not support dx9 or above and only Mark know
how much work is needed to support dx9 (may be very easy for him).
:)