No, only new is raising the reference count of the object. Without that, you will still have a reference, but the data behind it won't exist anymore.
Going the Clone method way is the much more stable and correct way and how it is done normally as well. Most are just "too lazy" to write once a clone method for each class they create. :-) (I've one in every class I instance)
Going the Clone method way is the much more stable and correct way and how it is done normally as well. Most are just "too lazy" to write once a clone method for each class they create. :-) (I've one in every class I instance)