FD: There have been several example codes that break after 5-7 hours so it was clearly shown how it is broken. the postings were not like "it breaks" and nothing else ... perhaps you missed that.
Perhaps I did. Since you may have suspected this, why didn't you post a link?I don't think asking for a link to source code that demonstrates it is unreasonable. Like I've already said, we've had our source code running for weeks without slowdowns or crashes (that wheren't our fault). In fact I've had code run for more than 10 hours that DID have a serious flaw in it, that didn't crash or slow down in that amount of time (ofcourse it was pretty slow to begin with).
If this mystery slowdown really exists, I'd be as psyched as the other guy to nail it. Without code that reproduces the problem, and is demonstrably free of logic flaws, I don't see how that's possible.