I agree with OEJ.
Rather than mark products as beta, I think they should be marked as 'experimental' or 'test version'. So much software people use these days is marked as beta that its meaning is somewhat lost. Clearly defining something as not-for-release should limit the 'I paid for this and it doesn't work' response.
Rather than mark products as beta, I think they should be marked as 'experimental' or 'test version'. So much software people use these days is marked as beta that its meaning is somewhat lost. Clearly defining something as not-for-release should limit the 'I paid for this and it doesn't work' response.