Quoted for truth.
Ant, I'd ask you to think about this. If you think BRL/Skidracer is against you - and I have no evidence to disprove this - then might it not be the purpose of the exercise that you react in the way you are reacting, annoying other people, and thus justifying whatever action may be taken against you? I can't help thinking that you're doing exactly what someone - if they were against you - would want you to do.
I understand that you feel like you're under attack, but I've always believed that the best way to respond to an attack is to do what the attacker would least like you to do. I can't imagine that reacting in the way you have is what the "attacker" would least like you to do. In fact, I think this is what they would most like you to do.
What they would least like you to do, is to behave rationally, politely, patiently, and play the waiting game. You're not going to sell 100 copies of Aurora today, but you might lose 100 sales of Aurora if you can't access the site for three months.
Oh I know, this is exactly why they are doing.
They're scared of the threat Aurora represents so they're trying a 'clever' and co-ordinated plan of self destruction.
What puzzles me if they are so against me why they just don't ban me.
It's also a shame to hink Mark Sibly would allow his mods to behave so foolishly.