@FD: It would entirely depend on what you have more of; time or money.
From memory, Indie had a whole heap of fun tracking down bugs and browser idiosynchratic behaviour when developing igLoader. I don't think I'd like to try my hand at reacreating it.
@gellyware: exe-in-a-browser is a very attractive thing, but aas you can see it's also a not-so-easy thing (to do the way you want to). You've either got to bite the bullet and try developing your own loader, or you design your site around the problem and just offer standard downloads.
Personally, I'd like to see you go for making your own loader. Market could do with some competition ;)
From memory, Indie had a whole heap of fun tracking down bugs and browser idiosynchratic behaviour when developing igLoader. I don't think I'd like to try my hand at reacreating it.
@gellyware: exe-in-a-browser is a very attractive thing, but aas you can see it's also a not-so-easy thing (to do the way you want to). You've either got to bite the bullet and try developing your own loader, or you design your site around the problem and just offer standard downloads.
Personally, I'd like to see you go for making your own loader. Market could do with some competition ;)