Hmmm. Interesting argument.
The fact you have the same sig at CW *but* no BlitzMax logo in your Purebasic forum sig would suggest you're advocating Purebasic over BlitzMax hence advertising.
Let's face it, from your posts at CW it's obvious you're a Purebasic fan (and why not, it's a superb language) even at the expense of BlitzMax comments.
Personally, I don't really care what's in your sig but I think you're trying to be 'Draconusian clever'.
The fact you have the same sig at CW *but* no BlitzMax logo in your Purebasic forum sig would suggest you're advocating Purebasic over BlitzMax hence advertising.
Let's face it, from your posts at CW it's obvious you're a Purebasic fan (and why not, it's a superb language) even at the expense of BlitzMax comments.
Personally, I don't really care what's in your sig but I think you're trying to be 'Draconusian clever'.
hehe. well i dont see it as advertising ;)
but thats my opinion. all i know is:
its my sig. its not alot of pictures. it doesnt violate forum rules. its 5 lines. end of.