>just because something is written on paper does NOT
>exclude it from being biased.
I didn't say it was.
>someone will always give a good review to their game if
>they like the game. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A NON-BIASED
>REVIEW.
Of course not, but a professional reviewer will know what is important and what is not. He will also attempt to give a fair evaluation of the game and describe his reasoning. This is sorely lacking when john doe does a review, then the game is either da_bomb or worthless. When you look at the other reviews by the same person, you find that all of his reviews are like that.
Andy
>exclude it from being biased.
I didn't say it was.
>someone will always give a good review to their game if
>they like the game. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A NON-BIASED
>REVIEW.
Of course not, but a professional reviewer will know what is important and what is not. He will also attempt to give a fair evaluation of the game and describe his reasoning. This is sorely lacking when john doe does a review, then the game is either da_bomb or worthless. When you look at the other reviews by the same person, you find that all of his reviews are like that.
Andy