wouldn't it require that the Blitz3D SDK is OO no... why should it...
you would simply wrap straight Blitz3D function calls inside class definitions... (like what you alluded to above)
somewhat defeating the purpose of it in the first place, no?
i don't follow you... you still get to encapsulate each classes functionality within the class definition... you still get to inherit from base classes... you still get all the good stuff that makes OOP worthwhile...
... how is this defeating the purpose... i don't follow you on this 'Duck.
--Mike