Rather than hijack the thread where this started...
Well ok i've just knocked up this sig and yes by Blitz standards it's bigger than most, although I dont think it's the biggest here.
It's much smaller than signiatures on other forums as it measures just 376x100 which to me seems reasonable. Is it really too big here, what is the ruling on sigs?
The reason for this change is because i'm currently revamping my team web site and the image on the left, in it's full size, is to be part of the welcome screen. I figured it looked nice as a banner and would work well as a forum signiature and be part of an all new fresh look for my team.
Perhaps it just stands out so much because it is high contrast with big bold lettering? Isn't that the point of a banner though ... to maximise the impact of the small space of the image? Or are banner and signiature images really a seperate art?
Woah! What's with all the huge sig images lately?
Well ok i've just knocked up this sig and yes by Blitz standards it's bigger than most, although I dont think it's the biggest here.
It's much smaller than signiatures on other forums as it measures just 376x100 which to me seems reasonable. Is it really too big here, what is the ruling on sigs?
The reason for this change is because i'm currently revamping my team web site and the image on the left, in it's full size, is to be part of the welcome screen. I figured it looked nice as a banner and would work well as a forum signiature and be part of an all new fresh look for my team.
Perhaps it just stands out so much because it is high contrast with big bold lettering? Isn't that the point of a banner though ... to maximise the impact of the small space of the image? Or are banner and signiature images really a seperate art?