PowerPC603,
1) Aha, understood.
2) Yes, you're right. I shouldn't need to specify the same field for derived types. Silly me.
3) Excellent. This answer has addressed a lot of misconceptions I had with using types in this way. Yippee! :)
Thank you so much,
1) Aha, understood.
2) Yes, you're right. I shouldn't need to specify the same field for derived types. Silly me.
3) Excellent. This answer has addressed a lot of misconceptions I had with using types in this way. Yippee! :)
Thank you so much,