Personally I just think types are definitively NOT the holy grail, au contraire, they lead to lazy programming habits and the programmer gives the total control out of his hands.
"For Each" - I mean, what is that anyway? It's a mess. Throw a lot of stuff into the sandbox, and then do something with EACH one of them. It's called delegation and leads to rumours and revolutions, or in terms of computer speech: to bugs, lags and instabile apps.
Did you notice how long it took until somebody actually relaized the bug in the types that was fixed with version 1.91? Don't tell me you know what's going on when you don't realize such a bug for years.
ok </ :P>
"For Each" - I mean, what is that anyway? It's a mess. Throw a lot of stuff into the sandbox, and then do something with EACH one of them. It's called delegation and leads to rumours and revolutions, or in terms of computer speech: to bugs, lags and instabile apps.
Did you notice how long it took until somebody actually relaized the bug in the types that was fixed with version 1.91? Don't tell me you know what's going on when you don't realize such a bug for years.
ok </ :P>