Sheeeoooot, you are right, Robert. I wonder how I missed that! I must not have implemented it properly.
Thanks for the kick in the butt!
jamesmintram, pretty good idea with the list of lists, it should be doable, but I still wouldn't have the indexing feature that I want. I would need to step through each node on the main list, and then step down through the link in the sub list until I get to the (x, y) that I want. Too much.
The array that Robert just mentioned will work beautifully.
Thanks for the kick in the butt!
jamesmintram, pretty good idea with the list of lists, it should be doable, but I still wouldn't have the indexing feature that I want. I would need to step through each node on the main list, and then step down through the link in the sub list until I get to the (x, y) that I want. Too much.
The array that Robert just mentioned will work beautifully.