Ziggy, what do you mean by "That happened when they change the motorola processors to the IBM ones, the new IBM procesors where made SPETIALY for apple, and designed to maintain binary compatibility with the old motorola processors."
The PowerPC found in the Apples do not share the same instruction set as the Motorola 68k line. From what I understand, the PPC macs employed an emulation scheme to run 68K software.
Also, although the initial press release from Apple didn't mention P4 as the actual processor, the fact that demos have already been shown running WinXP is a pretty good indicator that this is the case.
Here's an interesting theory: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050609.html
One with screen shots:
http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0506intelmac.html
And this sure didn't take long:
"Report: Apple Mac OS X 10.4.1 for Intel hits piracy sites"
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/6012/
Russell
The PowerPC found in the Apples do not share the same instruction set as the Motorola 68k line. From what I understand, the PPC macs employed an emulation scheme to run 68K software.
Also, although the initial press release from Apple didn't mention P4 as the actual processor, the fact that demos have already been shown running WinXP is a pretty good indicator that this is the case.
Here's an interesting theory: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050609.html
One with screen shots:
http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0506intelmac.html
And this sure didn't take long:
"Report: Apple Mac OS X 10.4.1 for Intel hits piracy sites"
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/6012/
Russell