@fredborg
I agree, it IS like saying goto should be removed. That's why we have various programming languages. They all have different ways of achieving things cause someone thought that it'd be best "their" way. So if a language doesn't have goto's does that mean they're stupid cause someone might have wanted it. No.
If a language doesn't have multiple inheritence are they stupid if the reasoning was that it complicates design? No.
Also, I never once said it shouldn't be in there...I said it was NICE, but open to abuse.
Aaron
I agree, it IS like saying goto should be removed. That's why we have various programming languages. They all have different ways of achieving things cause someone thought that it'd be best "their" way. So if a language doesn't have goto's does that mean they're stupid cause someone might have wanted it. No.
If a language doesn't have multiple inheritence are they stupid if the reasoning was that it complicates design? No.
Also, I never once said it shouldn't be in there...I said it was NICE, but open to abuse.
Aaron