What Shattered was talking about is the recording framerate. I know this statement, it is a scientific insight of the time when they tried to find the optimal framerate for movies. The point is: when you record a movie and the lense is open of 33 ms, then you have the whole motion of 33ms on one frame, thus motionblur. Now when you have 30 FPS with full 33ms motionblur recording, you won't see the diffrence to 60hz with 16.6ms motionblurred recording. Or at least the average human eyes won't see the diffrence.
Of course, this is not the same like crystalclear rendered Pictures without any motionblur. There you can easily see the diffrence up to Famerates beyond 100 fps, although you need a refreshrate on the monitor that is high enough, otherwise you'll always be limited to the physical framerate.
Of course, this is not the same like crystalclear rendered Pictures without any motionblur. There you can easily see the diffrence up to Famerates beyond 100 fps, although you need a refreshrate on the monitor that is high enough, otherwise you'll always be limited to the physical framerate.