lol, I'm not disappointed at all - or surprised that method is faster.
I already said that I was already thinking of doing it along the line of how Rob H. etc. had suggested. I just thought I'd present a different approach. I did say it was a bit of a hacky way of doing it, too. :)
I already said that I was already thinking of doing it along the line of how Rob H. etc. had suggested. I just thought I'd present a different approach. I did say it was a bit of a hacky way of doing it, too. :)