No, or you would have found that many of the problems you mention are either easily fixable, or flat out not true.
Although I agree that the debugger could use improving. And you're right about the lack of byte support etc, and a couple of other things. But hey, the language is still evolving (which also means - horror! - that 100% backwards-compatibility can't always be guaranteed). Blitz Basic *is* 100% compatable with blitz3d however.
But it seems like you've made up your mind. What I want to know is, why did you buy it in the first place if you don't like it?
Aside from that, I also think that when you say that blitz is only for amateurs you insult everyone who is using it to create professional products, and personally, I take offense at that. And of course when you say "This is Not professional And Not serious enterprise." you are insulting to Blitz Research and the years of hard work that went into these products, which are easily worth the asking price.
I don't know what you're hoping to achieve with this outburst to be honest...
Although I agree that the debugger could use improving. And you're right about the lack of byte support etc, and a couple of other things. But hey, the language is still evolving (which also means - horror! - that 100% backwards-compatibility can't always be guaranteed). Blitz Basic *is* 100% compatable with blitz3d however.
But it seems like you've made up your mind. What I want to know is, why did you buy it in the first place if you don't like it?
Aside from that, I also think that when you say that blitz is only for amateurs you insult everyone who is using it to create professional products, and personally, I take offense at that. And of course when you say "This is Not professional And Not serious enterprise." you are insulting to Blitz Research and the years of hard work that went into these products, which are easily worth the asking price.
I don't know what you're hoping to achieve with this outburst to be honest...